1. The date 11/08/1996 is the date on which the copy of the patent was taken by the teacher who fought against this universal plagiariser! See how he has mastered the art of bluffing! A group of teachers who came to know about this buff-master’s plagiarisation , got a copy of it for verification on the date 11/08/1996. Please note his shameless bluffing about this date! He had in fact agreed that he plagiarised the American invention and the only claim was that he has modified it. Now he is trying to back track! What relevance is the date on which the copy of a document was taken is having? It is well known that the copy of the patent document was available with this plagiariser before. How can the date on which the people who wanted to prove him a thief acquired the copy of the document has any relevance to the whole story of stealing the IPR? This shows the mastery of this clone artist at bluffing! Probably he thinks that others are fools! We have produced the copy we acquired on 11/08/1996 to verify his stealing, let him produce the copy he acquired before 1995 for plagiarising! We should appreciate this shameless person for cooking up such a cock and bull story, since he is not having any arguments and answers to the questions asked.
2. There is no bluff by the blog’s authors but the bluff is by the universal plagiariser! He had agreed that he copied shamelessly from the American invention without giving any credit to them and only claimed that he removed some nut, bolt and spring. Now he is putting forth a strange argument that the date on which the people who wanted to expose his theft got the patent document is after the date of his INVENTION! His entire argument is based on this absurd and foolish statement which is a perfect lie!
3. It is well known to all that a teacher’s organisation has been trying to establish his bluffs at the time when this document was procured. Anybody can get a copy of the patent from the US office. What is he trying to prove by telling that there is only one copy of the document which is given to others by him only? Now the person he mentions is a well-known assistant of the bluff master, who is adept at forging documents related to even non-existent projects and is known to have no integrity at all. This argument seems to be the funniest argument this bluff-master and clone artist has made in his entire life time!
4. This person as everyone knows by now is a sub-standard person who was propped up by some of his assistants for their personal mileage. He used to preach great idealism and his mafia group specialised at “making a dog out of a goat” used to spread cock and bull stories about his idealism. Many times when he has to justify his illegal activities, nepotism and the unlawful activities of his mafia group like relatives setting question papers, arm twisting the custodian of the attendance register for illegally signing etc., he used to justify it by his trade-mark less-than-ideal situation. This is the bluff he uses when he has no arguments to justify his illegal activities. The inability of this sub-standard fellow is being blamed on lack of human resources! It should be noted that there were several projects which were completed successfully here and the projects taken by this fellow only miserably failed! The common factor in the only projects which failed is the PI, which proves that it was the only reason why they failed and all other factors being similar to all other successful projects can be neglected. All other arguments are null and void and not sustainable and are fake arguments to hide the inability of this sub-standard fellow.
5. All good institutions are having generators and premier institutions have facilities for non-stop electricity supply in their campuses. No such facilities exist in KCAET and the existing generators are sparingly used. It is only a fact that there are no power-cuts [or load shedding which is only done during the peak load time (06.30 p.m. to 9.30 p.m.)] during the day time except for infrequent and rare power failure due to unforeseen reasons. The generators are for such purposes when unforeseen power failure happens. This bluff-master is trying to justify his bluff that there were frequent power cuts to mislead the north Indian people who are used to day time power cuts. This shows his mastery in the art of bluffing and his shamelessness!
6. In the case of bluff-master, there are only failures. There is not a single person in the WORLD, except our bluff-master, who took only three projects in his entire service period and ALL of which failed without ANY achievements! The only proclaimed success is now proved to be stolen from America! There is not a single person in the world as shameless as this person to exhibit the stolen IPR in gold plating with public money! There will not be any single person in the world that in spite of knowing his inability after the failure of one project, shamelessly takes two more projects and fails in that too!
7. Whatever documents have been displayed here are obtained “under Right to Information Act or other fair means”. It should be noted that this same fellow was crying foul about “Right to Information Act” by numerous notices on notice boards and now that it is being classified as “fair means”! Even a chameleon can’t change colours so fast! This bluff-master is not answering the questions put forth: as why there are only his own markings, why the document provided to us by right to information act as the final report submitted at that time (1997) is laser printed and why there is an answer to the allegations raised in 2009 in a document presumably given in 1997!
8. The allegation raised here is a cock and bull story to malign people who are trying to expose his true face. The only fact that has happened is that when computers were purchased under the DGS&D rate contract, there were no arguments and haggling necessary since the rate was fixed by Government of India. However, the bluff-master was in the purchase committee and he had “struck some deals” (like a foreign travel for one of his loyalists) even in DGS&D rate contract cases. Hence he only proposed that he will argue with the computer suppliers to supply one MFD (printer-scanner-copier) also at the same DGS&D rate contract and he haggled with them to get that (ideally, it is unfair as the company is not bound to supply anything extra at the rate fixed by Central Government) and it is taken to stock and is still available in the computer centre, which can be verified by any one. I challenge this bluff-master to prove his arguments if he is a man. This clone artist will tell any lies to malign people who try to expose his true face. The story of kick-backs is such a perfect bluff!
9. This is another bluff! There was an AO at that time who was not in this bluff-master’s good book (he even told that he couldn’t sleep on many days till he succeeded in playing some dirty tricks against him [a fake ‘harassment of woman’ complaint was filed against him by his pet at the time of the retirement of the said AO]). The quarrel started with his pet about some income tax issues. The SO and AO demanded a receipt for autorikshaw fare which is not required as per KSR rules! Being the leader of a teacher’s organisation, this fellow requested one teacher to take-up this issue (most of the teachers in the teacher’s organisation simply used to forego the auto fare as they were afraid of fighting against this illegal activity). Even though it was the duty of a teacher’s organisation official to deal with such issues of the members, the hidden aim of the bluff-master was to settle his personal scour against the AO. The teacher was asked not to accept the cheque (for about Rs. 2500) for a paltry sum of Rs. 23 as auto fare! The matter went on at snail’s pace even when a teacher’s organisation was behind it! Finally the teacher himself had to put this issue as a question in the service column in a newspaper and the then Dean was instrumental in settling the issue! What the teacher has gained by getting his check of about Rs. 2500 after two years for a paltry sum of Rs. 23! (What would have been the interest on Rs. 2500 and what about the depreciation of the value after two years?) This shows the mind set of this bluff-master, even though the teacher agreed to stand with him for a common issue (at personal loss to him!), he projects whatever he should have normally done as a responsible official of an organisation as a personal favour! (This also shows what they does while sitting in such positions as even such silly things are being boasted upon!) That was in fact an attempt by the clone artist to settle scours with the AO and he thinks that the teacher whom he has used a scape goat was a fool to have fallen prey to his trick unknowingly!
10. The incident he dramatically narrates here again shows his mind set of personal enmity. The person he refers to here suffered at the bluff-master’s nepotism as he was transferred as part of the bluff-master’s game plan to make his pet the HOD of a department. A person’s gentleness is not judged by a single incident. We consider this clone artist as an indecent fellow because of his several actions like showing personal enmity in official dealings, nepotism, wasteful expenditure of public money, self-projection, stealing of IPR etc. etc. and note due to a single incident. A person, due to ill-influence of the mafia gang who are adept at “making a dog out of a goat”, especially in an inebriated condition, would have made insatiable comments on “someone who was projected as a dog” and the affected parties might have had questioned it. That will not prevent anyone from favourably commenting on a gentlemanly action done by that person unless he is blinded by considerations shown by people like our bluff-master! The same bluff-master has made several insatiable comments on this “Gentle man” for not playing to his design of making his pet HOD! See how fast this person without integrity changes his colours!
11. Another bluff aimed at personal maligning, as he has no answers to questions asked to him! This bluff is already answered in 10.
12. It is already answered in the answer to Sequel-1. See his mastery at making a dog out of a goat!
13. See that he is fearfully running away as he thinks that more illegal acts of him will be exposed! Also note that he is unable to answer any of the questions posed by us in the answers to his sequels and all throughout the blog! Since it is not right to fight against a coward who is running away, we will be pausing until he resurfaces again.
14. “Blog’s author’s dream of a recovery from me shall continue to remain a dream only” (in 2) can be proved to be wrong if he so desires! Again note that how arrogantly he states this, proving his unholy nexus with the powers that are supposed to implement that action! Again his stealing of the American patent could be very easily proven at the patent office and NRDC, if he continues to bluff!
15. I would like to narrate an incident to that this plagiariser will go to any extent to settle scours. He wanted to bring back "his humble servant" to the throne, for which he connived with "a goat to dog propagandist" and "a below average project PI" to dethrone "the person who will not dance to his tunes" by alleging that he is mentally destabilized! He even called up other people to support his evil design! Will any body do this to a colleague! No wonder he is making false allegations on others!
15. I would like to narrate an incident to that this plagiariser will go to any extent to settle scours. He wanted to bring back "his humble servant" to the throne, for which he connived with "a goat to dog propagandist" and "a below average project PI" to dethrone "the person who will not dance to his tunes" by alleging that he is mentally destabilized! He even called up other people to support his evil design! Will any body do this to a colleague! No wonder he is making false allegations on others!
A very good bye to the bluff-master and the master plagiariser for the time being! Meanwhile we assure you that we will update you with more legally procured documents on his illegal activities.
No comments:
Post a Comment